Tiny Invaders: The Rise of the Asian Longhorned tick

Olivia Triltsch • August 28, 2025

History

The Asian longhorned tick (Haemaphysalis longicornis) is native to East Asia but now invades New Zealand, Australia, and the United States. This species was first described to be present in the US in New Jersey in 2017, likely introduced by imported animals. Records show this species being found on domestic animals like livestock, wildlife, and humans. Other names recognized by USDA APHIS for this tick species include bush, cattle, or scrub tick, with nicknames varying by region 

Current Status

Asian longhorned ticks are listed as an invasive tick species due to the harmful diseases it can spread to humans and animals according the the CDC. This invasive tick species can now be found in 22 states throughout the country. Established populations range along the east coast from New York to Georgia, moving all the way west to Missouri. The Asian longhorned tick has the ability to reproduce without mating, contributing to the species’ prevalence to spread in new areas. 

Characteristics

This species is light reddish-brown in color with fewer distinguishing characteristics than the blacklegged tick, lone star tick, and American dog tick, also found in Michigan. Asian longhorned ticks are mostly found to be females, which are grey-green with yellow markings after feeding and can reach the size of a pea according to USDA APHIS. Starting out at the size of a seasame seed or smaller, these ticks can grow to be the size of a pea after feeding. 

Control

The Asian longhorned tick is recognized by the Michigan DNR to transmit diseases such as Rocky Mountain spotted fever, Heartland virus, Powassan virus, and Theileria orientalis. Diseases transmitted by ticks can be harmful to humans, pets, livestock, and wildlife alike. However, ticks do not immediately begin transmitting diseases to hosts as soon as they hatch into the larval or nymphal stage. Instead, ticks must latch onto an infected host in which the disease is transmitted to the tick and can then be transferred to future hosts. The length of time a tick is attached increases the potential for disease transmission to the host.  


To help avoid issues with ticks, it is important to perform regular and thorough tick checks for people and animals. Once a tick is found, it should be removed immediately and safely according to the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services Tick Bite Prevention page. Ticks removed from animals can be submitted to the MSU Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory (VDL) for identification and pathogen testing. Other ticks can be sent for identification to the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services via email (MDHHS-Bugs@michigan.gov) or mail.  


Photo above: Asian longhorned tick adults courtesy of Ansel Oommen, Bugwood.org.


The recommended forms of control for the longhorn tick include habitat modifications and maintenance. Creating an environment less suitable for ticks is the simplest prevention method, although it often requires repeated maintenance. Property maintenance, such as mowing and removing brush or litter, can help limit the number of spots where ticks can be found. Wearing light colored, long clothes tucked in can also aid in the detection of ticks early on. No acaricide resistance has been found in the established populations of the longhorn tick, according to USDA APHIS. Organophosphates, amidines, and synthetic pyrethroids can be an effective form of control and play a role in safety. 

Learn More

Tick identification is important as each tick species has a varying ability to carry different diseases. Blacklegged ticks are the only species that are known to transmit the bacteria causing Lyme disease. More information about Michigan ticks can be found on the Michigan DNR website. If you are interested in joining the fight against invasive species in Michigan, take a look at our upcoming On the Ground events utilizing volunteers to create an impact on the landscape.

Recent Posts

By Olivia Triltsch August 21, 2025
This project will work to enhance the habitat within Michigan’s first urban game area in honor of National Public Lands Day.
By Justin Tomei August 18, 2025
August 2025 CPB Wrap-Up 
By Justin Tomei August 15, 2025
Yesterday, the Natural Resources Commission unanimously voted via a formal resolution to reinstate Michigan’s year-round coyote hunting season ahead of the April 2026 closing of the season. This decision represents a win for Michigan’s hunters, and more importantly, sound scientific management. No changes to the wildlife conservation order (WCO) yet, but the commission approved a resolution that stated: “the Michigan Natural Resources Commission is committed to enacting a regulation for Michigan citizens to take coyotes year-round on public and private land through a combination of hunting, trapping, and lethal take of nuisance and damaging animals; and that the Michigan Natural Resources Commission is committed to acting on this matter before next regular furbearer regulation cycle in the Wildlife Conservation Order in 2026.” The vote comes after a year of work by Michigan United Conservation Clubs (MUCC) and Michigan Trappers and Predator Callers Association (MTPCA), who filed a lawsuit when the commission illegally closed part of the season in March of 2024. Today's vote constitutes a win for scientific management and Proposal G, but the responsibility to hold the commission to their word is now on all conservationists according to MUCC CEO Amy Trotter. “We all obviously would have preferred a resolution to the issue today,” said Trotter. “The commission has made clear to the conservationists of Michigan that they will fix the 2024 commission’s error, and the responsibility now rests with all of us to hold them to their word.” According to MTPCA President Joe Velchansky, this is a win, but not the final one. “We are closer to righting this wrong today than we were yesterday,” said Velchansky. “We will continue to work with the commission to ensure the commission makes the best decision for the resource, scientific management, and our outdoor heritage.” In February and March of 2024, the NRC, at the request of a small minority of stakeholder groups, approved an order to partially close Michigan’s coyote hunting season from April 15-July 15. The justification for the order was not biological data, or management need. Rather the commission followed emotional pleas and social perceptions, without any objective data backing up the claims, and illegally partially closed coyote season for a quarter of the year. Despite a DNR biologist's statement that the closure was put forward based on perceived social pressures, and countless pages of scientific literature being presented justifying a year-round hunting season, the season was closed. After the meeting, MUCC and MTPCA jumped into action on behalf of sound scientific management and Michigan’s hunters, anglers and trappers. A lawsuit was filed to appeal the decision and after months of trading paperwork, the final briefs were filed in November of 2024. In June of this year, a Lansing Circuit Court Judge ruled that the commission followed their charge in their decision making. Since the March 2024 vote, there has been significant turnover on the commission with four new members currently seated. Commissioner John Walters, who voted no on the closure in 2024, requested the amendment to reopen the season at the February 2025 meeting, and the order was up for information in March and delayed due to commissioner absences and bureaucratic hurdles before today’s vote. Year-round coyote hunting had been in place since the NRC adopted the measure in 2016, when Michigan joined at least 35 other states in allowing for year-round opportunity.  To learn more about MUCC visit MUCC.org To learn more about MTPCA visit MTPCA.com Contact: MUCC: Jtomei@Mucc.org MTPCA: Merlejones336@gmail.com
More Posts