Wolf Scientists Urge Federal Delisting in Great Lakes

Today, a group of nationally-renowned wolf scientists sent a letter to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Congress urging for wolves in the western Great Lakes to be returned to state management due to their biological recovery in the region. While wolves have exceeded Endangered Species Act recovery goals since 1999, a federal judge's ruling in December, 2014 returned them to the list following a lawsuit by the Humane Society of the United States, just the latest in a string of similar frustrations to getting the legal status of wolves to match their biological status. 

Wolf_with_Caribou_Hindquarter.jpg

(Photo: Wikipedia Commons)

Michigan United Conservation Clubs and other conservation and hunting groups have appealed that lawsuit and urged congressional action to delist wolves in the Great Lakes. The National Wildlife Federation adopted a policy this year supporting delisting, as well. Here is the text of the press release announcing the scientists' letter: 

Wolf Scientists Support Delisting Wolves in Great Lakes

Wolf populations in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan have successfully recovered and should be taken off the Endangered Species list, according to a letter sent today to U.S. Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell and U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Director Dan Ashe from 26 U.S. and Canadian wolf and wildlife experts.

“[I]t is in the best interests of gray wolf conservation and for the integrity of the [Endangered Species Act] for wolves to be delisted in the western Great Lakes states where biological recovery has occurred and where adequate regulatory mechanisms are in place to manage the species,” wrote the scientists.

“We believe that failure to delist wolves in these states is counterproductive to wolf conservation there and elsewhere where suitable habitat may exist. The integrity and effectiveness of the ESA is undercut if delisting does not happen once science-based recovery has been achieved.”

Gray wolves in the Great Lakes region of the United States have been federally listed as endangered since 1967 and federally protected since 1974. Since 1999 the wolf population in the Great Lakes region—Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan—met federal goals for delisting.

Wolves were absent for generations from Great Lakes states except for Minnesota and Isle Royale National Park in Michigan. Protections afforded under the Endangered Species Act allowed wolves to re-colonize the upper Great Lakes states of Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan, according to David Mech, a leading wolf researcher at the University of Minnesota.

Now there are more than 3,700 wolves in those states. “Wolf recovery is a tremendous success story,” Mech said. 

The species has been taken off the endangered species list and put back on the list several times due to litigation. The scientists are urging the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to delist again based on the overwhelming view of professional biologists and wildlife managers that wolves have biologically recovered.

“Now it’s time to recognize that success and take the next logical step: removing them from the list of endangered species so that state wildlife professionals can manager wolves locally,” added Adrian Wydeven, coordinator of the Timber Wolf Alliance at Northland College in Ashland, Wisconsin.

Wydeven, a former Wisconsin DNR wolf biologist, oversaw Wisconsin’s wolf recovery program from 1990 to 2013.

“Once a species has recovered, management responsibilities should return to the states and federal funding should be applied to species that truly are endangered,” Wydeven said. “State wildlife managers were instrumental in bringing back wolves to the upper Great Lakes states, and now it’s important that they use their professional expertise to make sure that wolves are a part of our landscape for now and generations to come.”

Showing 3 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • commented 2016-06-08 11:48:51 -0400
    Gail Carrol, what proof do you have that delisting will result in “hunting contests for fun and money?” Seriously, provide where in the Michigan Wolf Management Plan that would ever be authorized? The one hunting season (not contest) that was held had two specific goals of reducing wolf/human conflicts and making wolves more wary of people, neither of which was “for fun or money.” Don’t just repeat HSUS’s BS talking points, back up your claims.
  • commented 2016-06-06 03:57:22 -0400
    I am against anyone other than wolf specialists making life and death decisions for these magnificent animals. Hopefully, that will not result in hunting contests for fun and money. All wildlife needs to be treated humanely!!
  • commented 2016-06-06 03:05:42 -0400
    HELL NO!