Camo at the Capitol | Safety Zone, Anti-Poaching Bills Passed in House

Pro-hunting legislation to deter poaching and increase hunting access passed the House of Representatives today. The House passed HB 4239 unanimously and SB 244-246 by an average vote of 77-28. 

244.png

On September 9, during MUCC's Camo at the Capitol lobby day, the original version of HB 4239 was amended in the Senate Committee on Outdoor Tourism and Recreation to include the safety zone language. That language amends the 150-yard hunting safety zone so that it applies only to "hunting with firearms," meaning that, for example, bowhunters and trappers would be able to hunt within that zone on their own properties, or on public lands, without requiring the written permission of a neighboring landowner. 

The bill passed the Senate unanimously on October 8. Today, that amendment was concurred unanimously by the House of Representatives unanimously. An additional amendment to add an effective date of Jan 1, 2016, was approved by the House today, also. It will now get sent back to the Senate for concurrence with the effective date amendment. 

The anti-poaching package, Senate Bills 244-246, passed today, as well. It will set restitution payments of $5,000 for elk (up from $1,500), with an additional $250 per point for elk with 8 to 10 points and $500 per point for 11 or more points. Additionally, a first offense for poaching an elk will result in a 15-year license suspension, and a second will result in a lifetime hunting ban.

Similarly, restitution for a moose will increase to $5,000 for any moose and $10,000 for an antlered moose, with similar license suspension and revocation penalties as for elk. Bears will yield a $3,500 restitution fee, with a 5-year license revocation for a first offense and 10 years for a subsequent offense. Bearded wild turkeys will cost the poacher an additional $1,000 to the current $1,000 fee for any turkey. 

Showing 1 reaction

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • commented 2015-11-09 10:40:20 -0500
    Not sure I like no distance rules for bows and trapping, and I’m a bow hunter. I worry about possible down-sides, and just being polite. It might increase conflicts.
    I think it would be rather rude of me to hunt very close to my neighbor’s houses on my 2 acres without asking, since the deer is somewhat likely to land on one of my neighbor’s lots. It turns out they don’t mind, but at least I’d do the neighborly thing and ask. I don’t hunt from my roof, but the neighbors know I’m OK with them shooting deer (even with bullets, and one does, and I thank that family). If people start hunting and trapping in neighborhoods like mine, I worry that local rules against all hunting and trapping will become more common as a response, when in order to combat deer overpopulation in some places, we need them to become less common. I have been advocating more liberalized bow-hunting for deer in some communities that now ban it, since it can be done safely and politely, and worry that no distance rules at all, will stop any progress there. Trapping too near someone’s place might make for some very bad publicity for trappers, and with trapping and hunting we risk a handful of jerks doing it precisely to be in someone’s face with it, or we might inadvertently have more pets trapped, which is also bad press. It’s true that local ordinances might specify some distance for bow hunting, like 80 yards, and some places that might make it acceptable to residents. I’m open-minded, but worried.