<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Poll Released on Hunter, Angler Interests</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mucc.org/2012/11/new-poll-released-on-hunter-angler-interests/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mucc.org/2012/11/new-poll-released-on-hunter-angler-interests/</link>
	<description>Defending the rights of Michigan&#039;s Hunters, Anglers and Trappers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 02:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Miedzianoweski</title>
		<link>http://www.mucc.org/2012/11/new-poll-released-on-hunter-angler-interests/#comment-859</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Miedzianoweski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 23:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mucc.org/?p=4363#comment-859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I strongly agree with you as I am 53 and remember they were a good conservation group than BUT as you pointed out they changed I believe due to financial input from outside sources it is the money talking and not the group for the people .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I strongly agree with you as I am 53 and remember they were a good conservation group than BUT as you pointed out they changed I believe due to financial input from outside sources it is the money talking and not the group for the people .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dnus4730</title>
		<link>http://www.mucc.org/2012/11/new-poll-released-on-hunter-angler-interests/#comment-856</link>
		<dc:creator>dnus4730</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 19:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mucc.org/?p=4363#comment-856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I was a kid (I&#039;m 49 now), the National Wildlife Federadtion was, as far as I knew, a good solid conservation group on the side of hunters.  But it seems that over the last 20 or so years they have moved from science based conservation, to emotionally base environmentalism.  If I remember right, they have been party to many of the lawsuits to block de-listing wolves over the last few years.
Does anyone have some more solid information as to whether or not this is a group that us sportsman can trust?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was a kid (I&#8217;m 49 now), the National Wildlife Federadtion was, as far as I knew, a good solid conservation group on the side of hunters.  But it seems that over the last 20 or so years they have moved from science based conservation, to emotionally base environmentalism.  If I remember right, they have been party to many of the lawsuits to block de-listing wolves over the last few years.<br />
Does anyone have some more solid information as to whether or not this is a group that us sportsman can trust?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
