Comments on: Senate Takes Aim at Firearms Regulations

By: Rugeirn Drienborough

Rugeirn Drienborough — Sun, 22 Apr 2012 14:45:00 +0000

Exactly what difference would SB 984 make? As things are now, you can purchase any kind of gun you like from anywhere in the country by having the seller ship the gun to a Michigan FFL holder, who then transfers the gun to you. I suppose you could be on a hunting/shooting trip to some non-contiguous state, have your gun break, and want to replace it on the road, but what good will Michigan’s law do you, when the controlling law will be that of the state where you are? So, where’s the benefit? Is the real point allowing out-of-state people to buy guns here? How big is the actual population of people who arrive here from a non-contiguous state and want to buy a gun once they get here?

By: Rugeirn Drienborough

Rugeirn Drienborough — Sun, 22 Apr 2012 14:40:00 +0000

Firearms are directly related to hunting – a major form of tourism in this state – and target shooting – a major form of recreation in this state. Does that clarify the matter?

By: John Jeffrey

John Jeffrey — Fri, 20 Apr 2012 21:11:00 +0000

Reasonable legislation. Please figure out how to do this without mandating more expenses to the counties.
John J, Traverse City

By: Vane H. Smith

Vane H. Smith — Sat, 07 Apr 2012 01:07:00 +0000

I like the SB 59 & 984. The ideas are well thought out and needed. V. Smith. Charlevoix, Mi

By: Pfarrell45

Pfarrell45 — Fri, 06 Apr 2012 03:29:00 +0000

I just think it is funny that this bill would go to the committe on tourismand recreatiion

By: Michigan United Conservation Clubs » MUCC Thursday Legislative Round-Up

Michigan United Conservation Clubs » MUCC Thursday Legislative Round-Up — Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:20:29 +0000

[...] Senate Takes Aim at Firearms Regulations [...]