Comments on: Changes Made To Land Cap Bill

By: Michigan United Conservation Clubs » Land Cap Bill Hears Testimony

Michigan United Conservation Clubs » Land Cap Bill Hears Testimony — Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:55:50 +0000

[...] been one issue hanging like a dark cloud over the members of MUCC and the conservation community since the beginning of summer. That issue reached a big moment recently, but the outcome became even less clear in the [...]

By: Bill S.

Bill S. — Wed, 24 Aug 2011 14:03:00 +0000

Obviously this is corporate driven agenda. I can think of no valid reason to restrict the State’s ownership of public lands other than to make more property available for private concerns. I see this as an extraction industry agenda. As a resident I am proud of the many acres of public lands in Michigan. As I travel accross the country I see how fortunate we are. We need to hold this charateristic of our great State dearly and fight any agenda to restrict public lands.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 24 Aug 2011 13:03:00 +0000

they turned out the lights and now its forsale

By: Michigan United Conservation Clubs » MUCC’s 2011 Annual Convention

Michigan United Conservation Clubs » MUCC’s 2011 Annual Convention — Tue, 23 Aug 2011 14:54:24 +0000

[...] EMERGENCY RESOLUTION ON SENATE BILL 248 (2011). A resolution requesting that MUCC work to defeat this bill in the Michigan House of Representatives and urge the Governor to veto this bill if it reaches his [...]

By: Jack R. Westbrook

Jack R. Westbrook — Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:52:00 +0000

Everyone should contact their legislator to urge an unequivical “NO” vote on Michigan Senate Bill 0248 2011 and it’s progenmcy , the amendment to Michigan’s Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, as amended by 2004 PA 587
As my “Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund (MNRTF) 1976-2011” book illustrates, the State has been able to preserve such natural resource treasures as the tip of the Keweenaw Peninsula, the Arcadia Property along Lake Michigan, the Headlands property west of Mackinaw City, and dozens of others through the MNRTF (mostly oil and gas revenue State-owned mineral properties) from .
This developer-sided amendment to the Michigan constitution would mean that in order to save another natural area from developers, DNR Director Stokes would be forced to dump some other property over the side.
Anyone who loves Michigan’s outdoors should unite to fight this private developer greed-based travesty.

By: Rork

Rork — Tue, 02 Aug 2011 17:27:00 +0000

“(link)” is missing I think.